spongebob conspiracy image
DMillUSF
There are youtube videos all over about how politicians, movies, cartoons, food products, pop singers, and rappers all are in the illuminati and part of a new world order. I even saw videos showing Spongebob's "symbolism" in certain episodes. Also checkered floorboards are supposed to represent freemasons. I don't deny that there is a degree of truth to all these conspiracy theories (i.e. the Skull and Bones at Yale), but how much of this is really overblown?
Answer
The underlying basis of the Adam Weishaupt/International Banker-Illuminati is true. What Myron Fagan presented in the 1950s is 90-95% true. The CFR, Skull & Bones, Scroll & Key, Krewe of Comus, freemason connection, Bilderberg, Tri-lateral commission. Jacobins, etc is highly likely to be true. After 1000s of hours of research and 30 years of researching cults, I conclude that this IS true.
The stuff about the Illuminati murdering Michael Jackson, and connection to other stars -- is likely to be horseshzzz. Perhaps the Illuminati is using their blog-schills to convolute the issue by putting crap in blogs. I also ignore -- and hold low on the "viability scale" -- the notions of Fema death camps, the alien connection, chemtrails, and more, and that there is any connection to 12-21-2012 (the Mayan calendar thing).
The underlying basis of the Adam Weishaupt/International Banker-Illuminati is true. What Myron Fagan presented in the 1950s is 90-95% true. The CFR, Skull & Bones, Scroll & Key, Krewe of Comus, freemason connection, Bilderberg, Tri-lateral commission. Jacobins, etc is highly likely to be true. After 1000s of hours of research and 30 years of researching cults, I conclude that this IS true.
The stuff about the Illuminati murdering Michael Jackson, and connection to other stars -- is likely to be horseshzzz. Perhaps the Illuminati is using their blog-schills to convolute the issue by putting crap in blogs. I also ignore -- and hold low on the "viability scale" -- the notions of Fema death camps, the alien connection, chemtrails, and more, and that there is any connection to 12-21-2012 (the Mayan calendar thing).
Legal implications in a book about creepypastas?
Antonio
Iâm writing an anthology about the oldest and most famous creepypastas. The book is a collection gathering many tales from internet around the entire world. Itâs like an anthology about urban legends. However, I got some doubts⦠So, I have two questions:
1.All of these stories have not an author. Theyâre not original context. Is there any legal implication in write it saying thereâs no author?
2.Some of them are about real brands and enterprises, like the âSpongebob Creepypasta: Squidward's Suicideâ or the âSuicide Mickey Mouseâ. Theyâre like tales of conspiracy. Is there any legal implication in write it?
Thank you for your attention.
Considerations: All stories written there were carefully selected through the internet. Many of them talk about videos, images, music and real events, but in no way suggest any truth in the reports. They are uniquely works of fiction and nothing beyond this. At the end of the anthology, the original names of the stories are preserved for reference. These tales have no identifiable author. They are stories created on the web that fall into the category of non-original content, that is, stories created and recreated by many people in many places of the world. They are legends of the internet created with the sole purpose to entertain and surprise the reader.
Answer
Just because you have no way to find out who the author is doesn't mean you're free to use it for your own purposes. It's overt copyright violation for you to use it. If it uses copyrighted material (like SpongeBob), it's also in violation of copyright, and no publisher will touch it. If you made a website of it, it's entirely possible the copyright owners would send your host a take-down notice, and they'll remove the site without asking questions.
Just because you have no way to find out who the author is doesn't mean you're free to use it for your own purposes. It's overt copyright violation for you to use it. If it uses copyrighted material (like SpongeBob), it's also in violation of copyright, and no publisher will touch it. If you made a website of it, it's entirely possible the copyright owners would send your host a take-down notice, and they'll remove the site without asking questions.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment